> -----Original Message----- > From: rverghese [mailto:ri...@hotmail.com] > Sent: Thursday, February 09, 2012 12:49 PM > To: pgsql-sql@postgresql.org > Subject: Re: Concurrent Reindex on Primary Key for large table > > Thanks! That worked. > > Any thoughts about containing index bloat. I thought the autovac would > clean it up a bit more. Would any tweaks to my settings improve autovac > performance? I am still doing a couple of concurrent reindexes per week > otherwise performance degrades over a couple of days. > > Thanks > RV > > -- > View this message in context: > http://postgresql.1045698.n5.nabble.com/Concurrent-Reindex-on-Primary- > Key-for-large-table-tp5467243p5470216.html > Sent from the PostgreSQL - sql mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Did you try to make autovacuum "more aggressive" like lowering autovacuum_vacuum_threshold from 20000? Regards, Igor Neyman -- Sent via pgsql-sql mailing list (pgsql-sql@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-sql
