Hi, Swärd,

As you didn't name your tables' columns I decided to call them col1, col2, etc.

I dunno if this will do what you want as it is completely untested code.

But, give it a try and see if it works and if it doesn't, tell me the error, 
and we'll continue from there.
You'll have to substitute my col1, col2, etc with your actual column names.

Best,
Oliveiros


SELECT query1.t1_id, t1.col2,t1.col3,t1.col4, query1.minimum
FROM (
SELECT t3.col2 as t1_id, MIN(t2.col2) as minimum
FROM Table_3 t3 
JOIN Table_2 t2
ON t3.col1 = t2.col1
GROUP BY t3.col2
) query1
JOIN  Table_1 t1
ON t1.col1 = query1.t1_id

  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Swärd Mårten 
  To: pgsql-sql@postgresql.org 
  Sent: Thursday, March 01, 2012 10:30 AM
  Subject: [SQL] Aggregate and join problem


  Hi folks

  I have some troubles to create a SQL-query and my hope is that someone of you 
could help me with this..

  It's somewhat difficult to explain what I want to do but I'll give it a try 
and see if you can understand the problem.. Ahh fuck this.. It's almost 
imposible to explain.. J I don't understand what it mys self after I have 
written it.. Read and see if you understand.. J 

   

  I have three tables:

   

  Table_1:

  A table with meta data for areas (names, geometries and so..). Every area has 
a unique id.

  Example:

  101 | 'small area' | 'area name' | geom 

  102 | 'small area' | 'area name' | geom.

  103 | 'small area' | 'area name' | geom.

  104 | 'LARGE area' | 'area name' | geom

   

  Table 2.

  A table with values for some smaller areas. Contains a reference to an id in 
table1 and a value

  Example:

  101 | 12.5

  102 | 5.5

  103 | 6.5

   

   

  Table_3:

  A cross reference table with id:s for witch areas are connected to each 
other. Eg. What smaller areas that's is inside a larger area.

  A larger area could have many smaller areas connected to it

  Contains a reference to table 1 for the smaller areas and a reference to 
table 1 for the larger area. 

  Example:

  101 | 104

  102 | 104

  103 | 104

   

   

  What I want to do is the following:

  The larger area should "inherit" the lowest value from the smaller areas that 
are connected to it.

   

  I want to be able to get all larger areas and let them have a value that is 
the lowest value from table 2.

  If you look at the example data I only want to get the larger area (104) from 
table 1 with a value from table 2 that is the lowest value of the  areas 
connected to id 104. The result would be: 104 | 'LARGE area' | 'area name' | 
geom. | (value from table 2 id 102)

   

  Best regards, Mårten

Reply via email to