On 29 May 2013, at 07:42, Camillo Bruni <camillobr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Nice! > > BTW at some you should come and plug in Igor's experimental native boost > decoder in Zinc ;) > Because this is the kind of algorithmic that Smalltalk usually sucks at. Yes, that is very much needed. We should do that, at least as an option. The current code is now acceptable for Strings with a lot of runs of ASCII or, in the encoding case, runs of Latin1, but it is fundamentally as slow as before on heavy Unicode strings. > On 2013-05-29, at 07:17, Sven Van Caekenberghe <s...@stfx.eu> wrote: > >> Thanks guys, we are all trying to do our best in our corner and together we >> move forward. >> >> On 28 May 2013, at 23:20, "Esteban A. Maringolo" <emaring...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >>> So impressive that if you put it in a chart, the "Before" series are >>> practically invisible. >>> >>> Esteban A. Maringolo >>> >>> >>> 2013/5/28 stephane ducasse <stephane.duca...@free.fr> >>> Thanks sven this is impressive :) >>> >>> Stef >>> >>> On May 28, 2013, at 10:51 PM, Sven Van Caekenberghe <s...@stfx.eu> wrote: >>> >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> I prepared >>>> >>>> https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/10775/Update-Zn-Zdc-May-2013 >>>> >>>> with a lot of comments that I won't repeat here. >>>> >>>> It is ready for 3.0 >>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> >>>> Sven >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Sven Van Caekenberghe >>>> http://stfx.eu >>>> Smalltalk is the Red Pill >>> >>> <ZnBench.png> >> >
