The mail was more that I would prefer to have less block inside block and cull:
On Aug 28, 2013, at 1:14 PM, Tudor Girba <tu...@tudorgirba.com> wrote: > That is what I knew, too. I asked because the mail seemed to suggest that it > would work :). > > Doru > > > On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 12:54 PM, Esteban Lorenzano <esteba...@gmail.com> > wrote: > no, it is not. > that will keep the registry forever because it acts over a block (no > ephemerons, remember) > > Esteban > > On Aug 28, 2013, at 11:56 AM, Tudor Girba <tu...@tudorgirba.com> wrote: > >> Does this work? >> >> Doru >> >> >> On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 11:54 AM, Stéphane Ducasse >> <stephane.duca...@inria.fr> wrote: >> whenListChanged: aBlock >> "Specify a block to value after the contents of the list has changed" >> >> "Basically when you set a new list of items" >> >> <api: #event> >> | block | >> block := [ :announcement :ann | >> aBlock >> cull: announcement newContents >> cull: announcement oldContents >> cull: announcement >> cull: ann ]. >> listAnnouncer weak >> when: ValueChanged >> do: block >> >> >> >> >> -- >> www.tudorgirba.com >> >> "Every thing has its own flow" > > > > > -- > www.tudorgirba.com > > "Every thing has its own flow"
