To continue the discussion on this topic (stemming from issue 11635) I’m starting a new thread. Please share your thoughts.
Form the other thread: > Personally I'm for more intention revealing selectors; I quite like #shuffled > and #shuffleInPlace. If we can agree on a different naming scheme we should > then apply it to other methods aswell of course (e.g. #sorted, #sortInPlace). My proposition is to keep the selectors named #…d (#shuffled, #sorted, etc.), which operate on a copy, and rename the others (#shuffle, #sort, etc…) to #…InPlace (#shuffleInPlace, #sortInPlace, etc.). The rational behind this is that (to my mind) the current scheme is not intention revealing (e.g. #shuffle vs. #shuffled). Which is especially problematic for newcomers. Max
