On 2013-11-23, at 21:35, Marcus Denker <marcus.den...@inria.fr> wrote:
> > On 23 Nov 2013, at 21:25, Camillo Bruni <camillobr...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> >> On 2013-11-23, at 11:02, Hilaire Fernandes <hilaire.fernan...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >>> Le 23/11/2013 09:51, Camillo Bruni a écrit : >>>> opened https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/12229/XML-Tools-improvement >>>> otherwise these changes are as good as lost. >>>> sending mcz via mail is from the last century. >>> >>> Hello >>> >>> In the welcome page of the bug tracker, add a page explaining how to >>> create by yourself an account. >> >> It is all there: https://pharo.fogbugz.com/default.asp?W41 >> >> I was even so lazy that I made a video ;) since there are so many nasty >> steps >> involved that I don't think text will do it. > > and it should be noted that the scheme we use is not the way it is because we > think it’s perfect. > > This is really strange that people always pre-suppose that whatever is done > is done with indefinite > resources and therefore by definition exactly what was wanted. To the > contrary: we just make it up as > we go along, with very limited resources, sometimes doing wrong decisions.. > and we will slowly improve. > > And no, just stopping until the process is perfect is *not* they way to go. > This will just lead to nothing happening, > not to perfection. ... and we're one step closer: I removed some noise from the fogbugz entry page to guide people to the right direction.
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
