We have a small REPL image for Pharo 2.0 https://ci.inria.fr/pharo-contribution/view/Pharo-Kernel-2.0/job/PharoKernel2.0-OSProcess-evaluator/
It uses this code: https://gitorious.org/pharo-build/pharo-build/source/16a7598f75c46e6a12e2f4edf16710563e92dbe0:scripts/pharo/Kernel-2.0/OSProcessEvaluator.st -- Pavel 2013/11/26 Eliot Miranda <eliot.mira...@gmail.com> > Hi Guillermo, Hi Stef, > > > On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 2:33 PM, Guillermo Polito < > guillermopol...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> >> >> >> On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 5:09 PM, Stéphane Ducasse < >> stephane.duca...@inria.fr> wrote: >> >>> >>>> From the practical point of view, it's always faster to remove. >>>> something than to load something. And it's much faster to unload it without >>>> Monticello. So I would use ugly removeAllButPackages: because it's fast, >>>> then fix the problems like obsolete classes an Undeclared, continue with >>>> the pretty unloding part of the configuration and finally loading part will >>>> be easy. >>>> >>> >>> Tangentially can anyone point me to a headless image with a REPL for use >>> in testing Spur? >>> >>> >>> Guillermo has several bootstrapped and minimal images. >>> I tried to find them but I could not >>> https://ci.inria.fr/pharo-contribution/job/Bootstrap/ >>> >>> Guillermo? Is now on holidays. >>> >> >> Yes, but coding when not seeing family :) >> >> https://ci.inria.fr/rmod/view/Oz/ >> >> Right now I kind of broke everything... But what we have are mini images >> that just have an entry point method and quits. No repl cause they don't >> have even a compiler. >> > > As soon as you have something with a REPL in it I'd be interested. Please > let me know. > > Thanks > > and thanks for looking around Stef. > > >> >> >>> I will look around. >>> Stef >>> >> >> > > > -- > best, > Eliot >
