On Dec 2, 2013, at 8:46 PM, p...@highoctane.be wrote: > And missing a ton of methods. > > Teh StackInterpreterSimulator is agreeing with this statement.
send us the ones that are missing. Please note that we should kill the transcript in the future because this is a ^%$&*((^%$* outdated way to manage feedback: plain string, close the window data is lost, limited in length, no filtering….. bad bad bad does not scale horrible and so frustrating. I will not send you the current transcript I have because I deal with private code but this does not work. Stef > > > > > > On Mon, Dec 2, 2013 at 8:05 PM, Esteban Lorenzano <esteba...@gmail.com> wrote: > yes, the transcript is ThreadSafeTranscript > > > On Mon, Dec 2, 2013 at 8:00 PM, Yuriy Tymchuk <yuriy.tymc...@me.com> wrote: > Buy the way, is absence of Transcript class - ok? > > I know how it all works now, but is it ok? :) > > uko > > > On 02 Dec 2013, at 19:58, Esteban Lorenzano <esteba...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> yes, please :) >> >> >> On Mon, Dec 2, 2013 at 7:56 PM, Stéphane Ducasse <stephane.duca...@inria.fr> >> wrote: >> >> > The return of the toothpick is near. o/ >> >> No I will finish my logger :) >> >> Stef >> >> > > >
