I second that opinion on that D-flat language.

---
Philippe Back
Dramatic Performance Improvements
Mob: +32(0) 478 650 140 | Fax: +32 (0) 70 408 027
Mail:[email protected] | Web: http://philippeback.eu
Blog: http://philippeback.be | Twitter: @philippeback
Youtube: http://www.youtube.com/user/philippeback/videos

High Octane SPRL
rue cour Boisacq 101 | 1301 Bierges | Belgium

Pharo Consortium Member - http://consortium.pharo.org/
Featured on the Software Process and Measurement Cast -
http://spamcast.libsyn.com
Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect and Ability Engineering EADocX Value
Added Reseller




On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 9:28 PM, Esteban Lorenzano <[email protected]>wrote:

> Pharo does not has a single line of C#
>
> I cannot understand what it says that *I* program “mostly” in C#, when I
> do not touch that shity language since 5 years, at least.
> And I do not understand how to change it :(
>
>
> On 19 Dec 2013, at 21:14, kilon alios <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> As you know Ohloh is a very good promotional site for open source projects.
>
> Pharo has already a page on it. However I did observe that Pharo page
> experiences the same issue as  Amber. In Amber it reported that 80% of the
> project was made with Javascript. It reported that because Amber compiles
> it source code (smalltalk) to javascript. So all I had to do was to go to
> preferences page and add ignore filter for javascript folders and viola
> since then Amber is reported to be 80% smalltalk.
>
> http://www.ohloh.net/p/pharo
>
> Pharo is in somewhat or even more weird situation. Its reported to be 30%
> C which is the bad and 17% C# (WTF?) and 30% some other thing which are the
> weird parts. So maybe if you add ignore filters for some of the folders it
> may be able to increase the % of the smalltalk. It does not take time and
> if I was familiar with the build process of Pharo I could do it for you,
> but I have no clue. I assume it probably sees Slang as C# though I am not
> sure.
>
> I think its unfair for Pharo to be given the impression of a C/C# project.
>
>
>

Reply via email to