Ok I do not understand why I just receive today these old mails :) On 25 Dec 2013, at 20:53, Marcus Denker <marcus.den...@inria.fr> wrote:
> > On 25 Dec 2013, at 20:42, Stéphane Ducasse <stephane.duca...@inria.fr> wrote: > >> Guillermo >> >> do you have a test because we should really cover the classBuilder with such >> scenario? >> > > Yes, tests and the fix have been integrated last friday. > >> Stef >> On 17 Dec 2013, at 16:59, Guillermo Polito <guillermopol...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> Hi!! >>> >>> I started this afternoon to see a bug on class bindings on trait methods. >>> This one: >>> https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/11756/Reshaping-a-class-breaks-classBinding-identity >>> >>> Now, after playing and moving around that, I noticed that the problem is >>> worse: >>> >>> 1)Create Class A. >>> 2)Create method A>>m1. >>> 3)Create method A>>m2. >>> 4)reshape the class (e.g. add an inst var) >>> >>> Then: (A>>#m2) classBinding == (A>>#m3) classBinding ==> false!!! >>> >>> >>> The problem is caused because the recompilation of the methods is taking >>> place in a class that is not yet installed in its environment (the >>> Smalltalk system dictionary in this case). The installation of the class >>> takes part after the reshaping+the recompilation. Then, when the methods >>> are compiled, the binding is not available for them and new bindings are >>> created. >>> >>> Would someone with more idea on the new class builder give some advice? >>> Cause I'm a bit lost in the new class builder code :) >>> >>> Tx, >>> Guille >> >
