I know. This is why I am arguing that we should make the optional tools not optional. It would be a more profitable approach :).
Cheers, Doru On Mon, Dec 30, 2013 at 11:02 AM, Marcus Denker <marcus.den...@inria.fr>wrote: > > On 28 Dec 2013, at 13:36, Tudor Girba <tu...@tudorgirba.com> wrote: > > > Thanks for raising this :). > > > > I now added a simple implementation in the GTInspector to have Pointers > available for all objects. Perhaps it is overdoing it to have it by default > on all objects, but it was cheap to implement in a crude way. I still do > not eliminate all inspector related objects that point to the current > object, but it's a start (see attached the pointers to Smalltalk). > > > > If the inspector that is in Pharo gets a solution for pointers, then we > can directly clean up a lot of old code. > With this being done for tools that are just loadable optionally —> we > still have to keep the old code of the Explorer around. > > Marcus > -- www.tudorgirba.com "Every thing has its own flow"
