I added a development version to point to the baseline :) Cheers, Doru
On Sun, Jan 5, 2014 at 12:11 PM, Esteban Lorenzano <esteba...@gmail.com>wrote: > and you added a baseline 3.2 but not a version (not cool, doru, not cool :) > > On 05 Jan 2014, at 12:07, Esteban Lorenzano <esteba...@gmail.com> wrote: > > MAElementRow was still depending on RectangleMorph. > But it was more a problem of the #stable release: it was not updated. > > Esteban > > On 05 Jan 2014, at 11:42, Tudor Girba <tu...@tudorgirba.com> wrote: > > Hi Esteban, > > I fixed this issue in Magritte-Morph a long time ago when we ported Moose > to Pharo 3.0. What exactly is the issue? > > Cheers, > Doru > > > > > On Sun, Jan 5, 2014 at 11:34 AM, Esteban Lorenzano <esteba...@gmail.com>wrote: > >> >> On 05 Jan 2014, at 11:33, Marcus Denker <marcus.den...@inria.fr> wrote: >> >> > >> > On 05 Jan 2014, at 11:30, Esteban Lorenzano <esteba...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> > >> >> … is not there anymore. >> >> And Magritte-Morph requires it :( >> >> >> >> my guess: I was another victim of Stef compulsion of giving us a >> better and cleaning system :) >> >> >> > >> > The thing was that it had no state nor behaviour different to Morph… >> everywhere where it was used >> > (and especially subclassed), one could just put Morph. One concept less… >> >> cool… :) >> >> > >> >> But it should be replaced by what? >> >> >> > Morph >> > >> > Marcus >> > >> > >> >> >> > > > -- > www.tudorgirba.com > > "Every thing has its own flow" > > > > -- www.tudorgirba.com "Every thing has its own flow"
