Do whatever you want, I have no more motivation to discuss this anymore Ben
On 24 Jan 2014, at 14:34, Pharo4Stef <pharo4s...@free.fr> wrote: > Hi guys, > > I think that we will rename all the asReactiveVariable that got introduced > into their old name asValueHolder. > And we will rename the class too to its old name. > > Why? > > I think that we should not change at the last moment ValueHolder into > ReactiveVariable > even if the name could be better: > > - First there are books around (and not only mine) that use this > vocabulary for decades. > - Second all the Spec tools developed by people right now do not work > in latest 3.0. > - I think that this change does not worth the noise it introduced: all > the future changes of Spec-based tools that > will be using asReactive will not work in Pharo3.0. > > > We are in beta and now we should not change that. > Then I would appreciate that we discuss it before. > Because I would not change that even between versions of Pharo. > > Stef