Sounds good :P I will integrate it into Spec dev (I think it’s safer for now to not remove it into Pharo since it’s frozen)
Ben On 12 Mar 2014, at 19:04, Laurent Laffont <laurent.laff...@gmail.com> wrote: > As far as I see, it seems safe to remove ComposableModel>>initialExtent .... > Spec tests green, TWM tests green and I haven't seen any problem yet. What do > you think ? > > Laurent > > > Le mercredi 12 mars 2014, 17:36:20 Benjamin a écrit : >> The first answer is: >> ComposableModel was not a subclass of model at first :P >> >> >> Ben >> >> On 12 Mar 2014, at 13:09, Laurent Laffont <laurent.laff...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> I'm trying to have tests green for TWM. I found: >>> >>> ComposableModel>>initialExtent >>> ^ nil >>> >>> on superclass Model there's >>> >>> Model>>initialExtent >>> ^ RealEstateAgent standardWindowExtent >>> >>> that sounds good. So I don't understand why ComposableModel redefine >>> #initialExtent to answer nil. Any explanation ? >>> >>> Laurent >>> >> >
