2014-03-17 10:15 GMT+01:00 Pharo4Stef <[email protected]>:

>
> well we will have to clean and simplify all that in the future.
>> This is why versionner should be good so that people use it and we can
>> simplify the declarations.
>>
>> Stef
>>
>>
> But I had the  feeling that Versionner UI is currently very limited vs
> Metacello options (especially w.r.t. cross dialect support)
>
>
>
> The problem is that metacello is too complex. :)
> And the API could be better.
>
>
Agree, see my other reply to Sven.
An alternative is to
- keep UI simple (mostly as it is now) by focusing onto single
dialect/single dialect version
- to automate the single dialect extract and cross dialect merge
But maybe it's easier to say than do ;)


> Or do you have a different POV, like only Pharo3.0 stuff should go to
> MetaRepoForPharo3.0, and the ConfigurationOf... should be expunged from any
> other dialect/version ?
>
>
> For now this is ok to have multiple dialects in the metarepo because
> people may want to have gemstone and squeak version.
> Now for the core Pharo tool configruations should be as simple as possible
> (RB, ...)
>
> Stef
>
>
>
>>
>>>
>>> Bye
>>> T.
>>>
>>> *Gesendet:* Sonntag, 16. März 2014 um 17:31 Uhr
>>> *Von:* "Nicolas Cellier" <[email protected]>
>>> *An:* "Pharo Development List" <[email protected]>
>>> *Betreff:* Re: [Pharo-dev] Adding a new catalog entry
>>>
>>> 2014-03-16 16:06 GMT+01:00 Sven Van Caekenberghe <[email protected]>:
>>>>
>>>> Nicolas,
>>>>
>>>> On 16 Mar 2014, at 10:08, Sven Van Caekenberghe <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> > To get access your StHub account, if you have any, should be part of
>>>> the Pharo team, but I don't think I can do that.
>>>>
>>>> I now see that 'nice' is part of 'Pharo', so I think you should be able
>>>> to save to MetaRepoForPharo30.
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Thanks, I think I messed up when entering my credentials...
>>> I have now published with a symbolic stable version.
>>>
>>>
>>>> Sven
>>>
>>>
>

Reply via email to