Well… the whole community of programming language call a closure a closure. Calling a block what is actually a closure may not be a well-marketed move in my opinion.
Alexandre -- _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;. On Apr 17, 2014, at 10:29 AM, Sebastian Sastre <sebast...@flowingconcept.com> wrote: > On Apr 17, 2014, at 10:08 AM, Yuriy Tymchuk <yuriy.tymc...@me.com> wrote: > >> I would rather rename is to Block, as everyone is calling it a “block”. > > That might be actually a good idea > > sebastian > > o/ > > PS: thinking in that line there is also ‘Context’ as, conceptually, what > these blocks of code want to do is to keep the evaluation in a specific > context. But to ease know-how transference and type less I’d rather go with > the most popular name, as you suggested: ‘Block' > >
