On 20 May 2014, at 19:49, Nicolas Cellier <[email protected]> wrote:
> > 2014-05-20 4:42 GMT+02:00 Alexandre Bergel <[email protected]>: > Some students have also tried to update Pharo using the update stream. Is > this still used? Should nt it be removed > > Alexandre > > > How I see it: > > Pharo team wants to perform deep changes into the system. > Pharo team wants to perform those changes fast, and not be swamped like they > think squeak is > (it sure was! but let's say that Squeak values backward compatibility which > is naturally a drag). > > It might be difficult/take a long time to find a way to perform these changes > in a reproducible way in customers' images. > So the philosophy it let updateStream tools available, but do not bother with > update stream if it's too difficult. > It's without any guaranty and I often saw it fail (once every few dozens of > updates...) > > I'd say keep it as is. Pretty good summary, maybe we should make it less accessible... > Nicolas > > > > Le 19-05-2014 à 15:49, kilon alios <[email protected]> a écrit : > > > > I felt adventurous today, so I said what the hell lets try to update Pharo > > with the updater tool. So I used world menu navigated to system and choose > > software update. And after a long download and method's compiling the > > attached image appeared :) > > > > > > > > > > <Screen Shot 2014-05-19 at 22.46.28.png> > >
