On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 8:30 AM, stepharo <steph...@free.fr> wrote: > Hi yuriy > > have a look at > > http://smalltalkhub.com/#!/~StephaneDucasse/AutomaticMethodCategorizer > > I should check again what I wanted to do before release and integration. > The point is not to make it too complex. > I would like to have much better rules and in fact I want to recategorise > the complete system with them > but we have to take care. >
It would be nice to have a way to add typical protocols. e.g. Doing Seaside dev, add initialization/rendering/actions/... protocols. Now, I can always copy a "template" class, but it would be nice to have. Phil > > Stef > > On 19/5/14 15:08, Yuriy Tymchuk wrote: > >> Hi Stef (and all :)). >> >> Would be nice. I’m anyway going to do something for Pharo and from time >> to time I’m making small contributions here and there. As now I’m working >> on code design/quality out of listed things I like method categoriser the >> most. But other options are acceptable. >> >> Uko >> >> On 19 May 2014, at 09:10, stepharo <steph...@free.fr> wrote: >> >> Hi guys >>> >>> This is a call for some of you that committed code and would like to do >>> it with me :). >>> I have some projects that I would like to push further in 4.0 and I'm >>> thinking that >>> he could be much more fun to do it with other people. >>> >>> Here are some topics >>> - integrating the systemLogger >>> - integrating/improving the new method categorizer >>> - cleaning fonts >>> - ... >>> >>> How this could work? >>> We could have >>> - some discussions >>> - make a little roadmap >>> - then we could work on the same slice and do code review >>> >>> I think that it can be fun and motivating. So let me know because I >>> would like to have more social >>> coding. >>> >>> Stef >>> >>> >> >> >> > >
