On Thu May 22 01:18:51 2014 Eliot Miranda <eliot.mira...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi All,
> 
> 
> On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 3:11 AM, stepharo <steph...@free.fr> wrote:
> 
> > We would love to have a real update but I'm sure that you realize that
> > something we
> > are modifying the system that modify the methods modifying the system.
> > 
> 
> but we've been doing that for years.   It used to be tricky using change
> sets, but Monticello's update scheme means it is very simple.
> 
> 
> > 
> > So we should probably remove the software update button.
> > Now if somebody wants to work on an infrastructure supporting real
> > atomic load.
> > 
> 
> I don't think one needs atomic load to do this.   It is very nice to have
> but Monticello's update scheme is sufficient.
> 
> 
> > Stef
> > PS: the last time I updated my iPhone it blocked and I had to fully
> > reinstall everything.
> > And once when I updated my mac my mouse got blocked forever on the left
> > top corner.
> > 
> > But I can't remember the last time an update for Squeak failed and the
> updates are of the cool kind you mention.   Personally I think having an
> update system is a *really important* facility in a development
> environment.   It means I can keep my personal working environment
> up-to-date.   That means I'm more likely to be able to contribute my own
> improvements to the system.
> 
> I worked for a long time with VisualWorks which has a closed development
> cycle, and doesn't support anything like update.   Keeping up to date was
> always slightly tedious (one had to do things like export one's own stuff
> and import it into the latest image, etc).   Since I've been using Squeak
> I've understood how superior the Monticello scheme is.   So I would urge
> you to /not/ remove the update button, and instead educate people in the
> process so that potentially dangerous changes are done properly (by
> defining baselines, a.k.a. updates in Monticello) and hence preserve the
> valuable ability to keep one's own image up-to-date.
> 
> -- 
> best,
> Eliot


Are we talking about the update menu item
in the system menu?
I don't understand this discussion, I always use
this menu item for updating the image.
I thought this is the nomal way. And 
I never had any problems with that
(maybe it works because I use it regulary)

How do you keep the image up to date?

Nicolai

Reply via email to