Thanks Sven!
On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 10:46 AM, Sven Van Caekenberghe <s...@stfx.eu> wrote: > A patch mechanism ? > > That would be cool indeed, although probably not doable in all cases. > > On 25 Jun 2014, at 10:23, Norbert Hartl <norb...@hartl.name> wrote: > > > Wouldn't it be wonderful if we could install packages from a ticket in > the image? Something like > > > > - get 3.0 image > > - fix from issue 12345 and issue 45678 and... > > - install own own packages > > - deploy > > > > It would be so well documented :) > > > > Norbert > > > > Am 25.06.2014 um 08:47 schrieb Sven Van Caekenberghe <s...@stfx.eu>: > > > >> I only did it in 3.0 > >> The file out is attached to the slice - it is 100% standalone > >> > >> On 25 Jun 2014, at 00:45, Norbert Hartl <norb...@hartl.name> wrote: > >> > >>> thank you, Sven. Did you try this in 3.0, too. I would need it there! > >>> > >>> Norbert > >>> > >>>> Am 25.06.2014 um 00:11 schrieb Sven Van Caekenberghe <s...@stfx.eu>: > >>>> > >>>> https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/13395/Add-SHA256-HashFunction > >>>> > >>>> cleaned up, documented, properly packaged. > >>>> > >>>> Passes some test vectors. > >>>> > >>>> I changed the handling of the empty stream. > >>>> > >>>>> On 24 Jun 2014, at 23:03, Sven Van Caekenberghe <s...@stfx.eu> > wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>> Hi Jan, > >>>>> > >>>>> I loaded just the class CFSHA256 and it worked perfectly (I didn't > expect anything else). > >>>>> > >>>>> I tried some examples from Wikipedia ( > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sha256#Examples_of_SHA-2_variants): > >>>>> > >>>>> (CFSHA256 hashMessage: 'The quick brown fox jumps over the lazy > dog') hex. > 'd7a8fbb307d7809469ca9abcb0082e4f8d5651e46d3cdb762d02d0bf37c9e592' > >>>>> > >>>>> (CFSHA256 hashMessage: 'The quick brown fox jumps over the lazy > dog.') hex. > 'ef537f25c895bfa782526529a9b63d97aa631564d5d789c2b765448c8635fb6c' > >>>>> > >>>>> So I will rename the class to SHA256, moving it to System-Hashing > and add SHA256Tests for starters. > >>>>> > >>>>> Sven > >>>>> > >>>>>> On 20 Jun 2014, at 17:01, Jan van de Sandt <jvdsa...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Hello, > >>>>>> > >>>>>> I added the SHA256 class to Cloudfork a few years ago. The class > was mostly copied from the Cryptography [1] project. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Cheers, > >>>>>> Jan. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> [1] http://www.squeaksource.com/Cryptography/ > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> On Fri, Jun 20, 2014 at 10:56 AM, François Stephany < > tulipe.mouta...@gmail.com> wrote: > >>>>>> Max, > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Yes, it's usable as the SHA1 package already there (without HMAC > so). I'm no expert in those stuff but I don't get "SHA256 base > implementation". Someone with more knowledge can probably tell ;) > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Sven, > >>>>>> > >>>>>> The bare minimum to load it is: > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Gofer it > >>>>>> smalltalkhubUser: 'JanVanDeSandt' project: 'Cloudfork'; > >>>>>> package: 'Cloudfork-Common'; > >>>>>> package: 'Cloudfork-Pharo-Platform'; > >>>>>> load. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> The implementation is in Cloudfork-Pharo-Platform. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 6:20 PM, Sven Van Caekenberghe < > s...@stfx.eu> wrote: > >>>>>> I want to have a look, if you tell me where to look... > >>>>>> > >>>>>>> On 19 Jun 2014, at 18:03, Max Leske <maxle...@gmail.com> wrote: > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> On 19.06.2014, at 17:59, François Stephany < > tulipe.mouta...@gmail.com> wrote: > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> Does it make sense from a license point of view and practical > point of view to include the CloudFork HMAC-SHA256 implementation (CFSH256 > class) in the System-Hashing package (in where there's already SHA1 and > MD5) ? > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Can Cloudfork HMAC-SHA256 be easily parameterized with, say, an > SHA256 base implementation? Or does it require extra stuff? In the former > case I probably wouldn’t add it. In the latter case it’s open for > discussion. Personally, I think it belongs into a separate package, not > into System-Hashing. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Cheers, > >>>>>>> Max > >>>> > >>>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > >
