On 26 Jun 2014, at 15:25, Sven Van Caekenberghe <s...@stfx.eu> wrote:
> Now, there is probably something wrong, and things can probably be tuned, but > I think this will always be slower. As I said, I understand it would be slower. But an image that runs at 100% for a couple of hours and then just dies because it runs out of memory is not my idea of expected behavior. Mind that the memory only gets freed when I close the browser. If I do a marginally smaller load, the load completes but my image size is stuck at 450 MB until I close the open browser. Johan
