Oh, Sorry, I didn't see your last question.

Thank you.


Esteban A. Maringolo


2014-09-02 12:14 GMT-03:00 Sven Van Caekenberghe <s...@stfx.eu>:
> I merged your branch and declared the result stable for Pharo 3:
>
> ===
> Name: Glorp-SvenVanCaekenberghe.89
> Author: SvenVanCaekenberghe
> Time: 2 September 2014, 5:08:03.507586 pm
> UUID: 5c4bda4a-9395-4015-b388-c8ce00b65e19
> Ancestors: Glorp-MarianoMartinezPeck.88, Glorp-EstebanMaringolo.87
>
> Merging with Esteban Maringolo's branch: adding a #dataAndTime PostgreSQL 
> type for Pharo
> ===
> Name: ConfigurationOfGlorp-SvenVanCaekenberghe.38
> Author: SvenVanCaekenberghe
> Time: 2 September 2014, 5:12:20.404014 pm
> UUID: a8d54504-7a5a-4a43-92cd-3d66b252611e
> Ancestors: ConfigurationOfGlorp-EstebanMaringolo.37
>
> Moved to #stable 1.7 for Pharo 3+
> ===
>
> On 01 Sep 2014, at 08:06, Sven Van Caekenberghe <s...@stfx.eu> wrote:
>
>>
>> On 01 Sep 2014, at 00:21, Esteban A. Maringolo <emaring...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Yes... it was intentional.
>>
>> OK, but what about the second part, about it being non-intrusive ?
>>
>>> Because there is no "official" maintainer of the GLORP package, I
>>> didn't want to add stuff to the main codebase. Same story as with the
>>> PostgresV2 package.
>>>
>>> Regards!
>>>
>>> Esteban A. Maringolo
>>>
>>>
>>> 2014-08-31 19:16 GMT-03:00 Sven Van Caekenberghe <s...@stfx.eu>:
>>>>
>>>> On 31 Aug 2014, at 12:27, Sven Van Caekenberghe <s...@stfx.eu> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>> ps: There is also other versions of GLORP I didn't bless as #stable.
>>>>>
>>>>> That seems a bit more complicated: the Glorp ancestry is mixed up, we 
>>>>> should merge this carefully:
>>>>>
>>>>> you made versions 86 & 87 while those already existed, the latest 88 
>>>>> skips your version.
>>>>>
>>>>> in any case, 88 now works for me, but I fear it skips your code
>>>>
>>>> Ah, I see, this was an intentional branch, right ?
>>>>
>>>> Anyway, your addition seems non-intrusive, since it only adds a type, 
>>>> which does not get used unless one specifically asks for it, correct ?
>>>>
>>>> If so, I can merge this, commit a new version and update the config.
>>>>
>>>> Sven
>>>
>>
>
>

Reply via email to