I agree with Alain here. From what I see Igor invested a lot
into this and I think it is just a problem of time once again
to make it complete and usable. The demos and code in the
repo are really promising! Or did I miss something?
To answer the original question it would be interesting:
1. why is Rubric better than the old model
2. what are the main differences between the old, Rubric and the new
(not only features but also regarding integration)
3. what is the current state of TxText, what is missing
4. how could the community help
Thanks
T.
> Gesendet: Freitag, 07. November 2014 um 14:47 Uhr
> Von: "Alain Plantec" <alain.plan...@yahoo.com>
> An: "Pharo Development List" <pharo-dev@lists.pharo.org>
> Betreff: Re: [Pharo-dev] Should Nautilus use Rubric?
>
>
> > On 7 nov. 2014, at 14:32, Norbert Hartl <norb...@hartl.name> wrote:
> >
> > I think we should submit TxModel to the vaporware awards 2014 :)
>
> Hi Norbert,
> I really don't think so. Have a look.
> TxText is a real perl, I can't believe it will not be released.
> Cheers
> Alain
>
> >
> > Norbert
> >
> >> Am 07.11.2014 um 14:24 schrieb Esteban Lorenzano <esteba...@gmail.com>:
> >>
> >> I would say yes.
> >> we would like to have rubric everywhere we need a real editor :)
> >> (while waiting for the new TxModel, this is the “less pain path”, IMO)
> >>
> >> Esteban
> >>
> >>> On 07 Nov 2014, at 14:07, Juraj Kubelka <juraj.kube...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Hi!
> >>>
> >>> Is it worth to integrate Rubric into Nautilus? Or is there any reason not
> >>> to do it?
> >>>
> >>> Thank you a lot!
> >>> Juraj
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
>
>
>
