2015-01-25 0:22 GMT+01:00 Sean P. DeNigris <s...@clipperadams.com>: > Ben Coman wrote > > Anyone see a problem with removing > > that last condition? > > Off the top of my head... Yes that doesn't seem like a good idea. You don't > want to find yourself inside Halt. You want to be in your code.
But isn't it already like that in case of #haltOnce ? > Although the > change makes this weird exceptional-sounding case better, it looks like a > hack that will make halts more annoying in general. The question is why you > end up deeply buried in the internals of Halt and how to prevent that in > this odd case. > > > > ----- > Cheers, > Sean > -- > View this message in context: > http://forum.world.st/Issue-12970-16-steps-to-get-through-halt-PROPOSED-FIX-tp4801405p4801457.html > Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk Developers mailing list archive at > Nabble.com. > >
