> On 05 Feb 2015, at 15:11, Marcus Denker <marcus.den...@inria.fr> wrote: > > >> On 05 Feb 2015, at 15:08, Max Leske <maxle...@gmail.com >> <mailto:maxle...@gmail.com>> wrote: >> >> I’m subscribed to a couple of resolved (and validated) issues on fogbugz >> which don’t seem to get integrated, although the integrator runs once a day. >> Is something going wrong there? >> >> Issues to integrate: >> >> https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/14669/Delay-refactoring-part-2a-avoid-UI-locking-up-when-timer-event-loop-is-stopped >> >> <https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/14669/Delay-refactoring-part-2a-avoid-UI-locking-up-when-timer-event-loop-is-stopped> >> https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/14064/Improvements-to-checking-termination-of-processes >> >> <https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/14064/Improvements-to-checking-termination-of-processes> >> > > > It is not an automatic process. > > 1) that a change passes the monkey does not mean that it is good. It always > needs human review > —> if that happens, we put it on “fix to include” > > 2) even issues on “fix to included” are integrated by a human. The tool is > quite good, though (just a couple of kicks) > > Keep in mind that not many people review issues… > > Marcus >
Oops! Both of those have been reviewed by humans. I’ll put them on “fix to include” (damn, I’m sure I’ve asked the same question before… sorry). Thanks Marcus
