> On 05 Feb 2015, at 10:09, Nicolai Hess <nicolaih...@web.de> wrote:
>
>
>
> 2015-02-05 2:20 GMT+01:00 Sean P. DeNigris <s...@clipperadams.com
> <mailto:s...@clipperadams.com>>:
> Nicolai Hess wrote
> > We lost this feature in 40097
>
> Which feature? Using bare associations instead of WorkspaceVariables?
>
> Yes, maybe feature is the wrong word - ability?
> What is missing now is, convert an association into a "VariableBinding"
> similiar to WorkspaceVariable or GlobalVariable, that implements the code
> generation methods
> emitStore: and emitValue:
>
yes, we could move it up to Association… but we should keep VariableBinding as
a subclass of
Literal so that people in the future e.g. can put a halt on a variable defined
in the
workspace.
And yes, in general we need a nice API for the compiler to hand bindings to it…
it is on my TODO
list.
Marcus
