On Sat, Mar 21, 2015 at 3:25 AM, Sean P. DeNigris <[email protected]> wrote:
> > There is however one thing that I think could be very confusing... the > build > artifact is called "Pharo_0.2.4.dmg". Now I understand the rationale that > for a new user we are trying for "PharoLauncher = Pharo", but even I was a > little confused seeing version 0.2.4. Since it's only an installer, if we > really need its version number in the artifact, how about > "Pharo_Installer_0.2.4.dmg" or even the more verbose but perhaps clearer > "Pharo_4.0_ Installer_0.2.4.dmg"? The application ultimately gets installed > as "Pharo" anyway. > > I second this. What is philosophy behind installing PharoLauncher as "Pharo"? I can't see the gain. To me "Pharo Launcher" is a suitable descriptive application name. cheers -ben
