> On 11 Apr 2015, at 10:10, Nicolai Hess <nicolaih...@web.de> wrote: > > > > 2015-04-10 17:28 GMT+02:00 Clément Bera <bera.clem...@gmail.com > <mailto:bera.clem...@gmail.com>>: > Well I guess I used to click proceed and not close the debugger... > > > I don't know who is working on the breakpoint support and I don't know how > long it will take. > Maybe we can fix thie image freeze and re-include the debugtest code until > the new breakpoint support. > > what do you think?
I would love that. I know a couple of people who already complained about the test debug feature missing and I think that said feature is really an important point of the IDE. That being said, it will probably mean delaying the release another week or two. Then again, releasing something in a good state is better IMHO than releasing on time. Cheers, Max > > > > 2015-04-10 1:24 GMT-07:00 Max Leske <maxle...@gmail.com > <mailto:maxle...@gmail.com>>: > > For a little more context: the issue was originally raised by Clara in the > thread titled "MNU: receiver of "stepToCallee:" is nil”. IIRC the issue was > easily reproducible when debugging a test, then closing the debugger (via the > close icon). Clicking “Proceed” on the other hand gracefully terminated the > process. > > Cheers, > Max > > >> On 10 Apr 2015, at 09:56, Nicolai Hess <nicolaih...@web.de >> <mailto:nicolaih...@web.de>> wrote: >> >> 2015-04-10 2:37 GMT+02:00 Clément Bera <bera.clem...@gmail.com >> <mailto:bera.clem...@gmail.com>>: >> I was using it frequently too and I have never experienced any issues... >> >> Ok, can you describe a use case, what test case you can start and >> close the debugger without image freeze? >> >> Maybe we can find what is the difference between that >> test case and those that freeze the image, and than find a fix. >> >> >> 2015-04-09 14:58 GMT-07:00 Nicolai Hess <nicolaih...@web.de >> <mailto:nicolaih...@web.de>>: >> >> >> 2015-04-09 23:38 GMT+02:00 p...@highoctane.be <mailto:p...@highoctane.be> >> <p...@highoctane.be <mailto:p...@highoctane.be>>: >> No Debug Tests? >> >> Geez, I am using that all the time. >> >> And you're never encountered this issue 14689 >> <https://pharo.fogbugz.com/default.asp?14689>? >> Or did this work in older versions? >> >> >> >> >> Phil >> >> >> On Thu, Apr 9, 2015 at 10:21 PM, Marcus Denker <marcus.den...@inria.fr >> <mailto:marcus.den...@inria.fr>> wrote: >> >> > On 09 Apr 2015, at 22:32, Sean P. DeNigris <s...@clipperadams.com >> > <mailto:s...@clipperadams.com>> wrote: >> > >> > Nicolai Hess wrote >> >> http://forum.world.st/do-we-need-to-debug-testmethods-from-within-Nautilus-tp4805795.html >> >> >> >> <http://forum.world.st/do-we-need-to-debug-testmethods-from-within-Nautilus-tp4805795.html> >> > >> > Ah, I miss that too! From that thread, it seems it was removed temporarily >> > until we have real breakpoints. Is there an issue for its return? >> > >> >> Not yet. >> >> Marcus >> >> >> >> > > >
