On a related topic, I'm not sure if we want every Fogbugz comment to come to the list, but can Fogbugz be configured to post just the Issue Open comment to this mail list. This should help us perform bug-report QA up front when the reporter has details to hand. If required reproducability details are not forthcoming, then we close the issue early. cheers -ben
On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 2:17 AM, Sven Van Caekenberghe <s...@stfx.eu> wrote: > > > On 28 Apr 2015, at 19:55, Marcus Denker <marcus.den...@inria.fr> wrote: > > > > > >> On 28 Apr 2015, at 18:19, Peter Uhnák <i.uh...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> > >> 666 open issues > >> The tracker is telling us that old issues are evil. :) > >> > > :-) > > > >> -> automatically put them on “closed, timeout” > >> -> send a mail to the original submitter AND pharo-dev > >> Maybe in the opposite order? After a period [year] send mail and if no > response within a week or two then close it. > > > > it would be easier to automate…. > > > > Marcus > > Yes, it should be automated (saving people's time is very important). > And yes, issue that are too old for anyone to care about should be > deactivated. > > >
