2015-05-19 7:49 GMT+02:00 Marcus Denker <[email protected]>: > > On 13 May 2015, at 11:21, Denis Kudriashov <[email protected]> wrote: > > Thanks's Marcus. It is beautiful thing. > > Is parsing locate errors by "dot"s? I mean how it will parse "3+. 1+2"? It > will be super cool if we have only "3+." as error but remains code as good > one > > > You can just look at > > OpalCompiler new > source: 'method 3+. 1+2'; > useFaultyForParsing: true; > parse. >
Impressive ! > > with the GT inspector, it has a very nice AST view: > The AST view of the GT Inspector is useless for serious work. I've been spending the past weeks and months looking at ASTs, SSA and CFGs of code and I allways need a twin view: node + source code (and selecting one of those node select the relevant portion of the code). Thierry
