> On 31 May 2015, at 13:29, stepharo <steph...@free.fr> wrote:
> 
> 
>> Hi,
>> 
>> this is an observation on usage of Metacello. I guess that metacello is too 
>> complicated to be used. For example I was using the `jenkins` version of 
>> Woden configuration, but now it’s broken.
> 
> How?
>> And when you look at the Woden repo[1] it says that the way to load it is:
>> 
>> Gofer new smalltalkhubUser: 'PharoExtras' project: 'NBOpenGL'; package: 
>> 'ConfigurationOfNBOpenGL'; load. ((Smalltalk at: #ConfigurationOfNBOpenGL) 
>> project version: '3.0') load. Gofer new smalltalkhubUser: 'Pharo' project: 
>> 'OSWindow'; package: 'ConfigurationOfOSWindow'; load. (Smalltalk at: 
>> #ConfigurationOfOSWindow) loadBleedingEdge. Gofer new smalltalkhubUser: 
>> 'ronsaldo' project: 'Woden'; package: 'ConfigurationOfWoden'; load. 
>> (Smalltalk at: #ConfigurationOfWoden) loadBleedingEdge
>> 
>> Maybe instead of depending on the configuration of Woden, and saying that to 
>> load my project, people should just use a stable version of my 
>> configuration, I should copy the script from Woden repo, add some more lines 
>> to load the other projects I depend on and ask people to run a half page 
>> script in order to use my tools?
>> 
>> What do you think? it looks like an easier solution.
> 
> I do not understand your problem.
> I know that jb produced a new configuration for Woden.
> And it should work. 

But it doesn’t ;). The script loads everything, while the configuration says: 
"Error: Name not found: WithOpenGLAndExamples”.

> Every project should have a configuration. 

But it should be a responsibility of the owner, not JB…

> 
> Stef
> 

Reply via email to