2015-06-21 2:47 GMT+02:00 Alexandre Bergel <alexandre.ber...@me.com>:
> Hi! > > I have the following: > > Object subclass: #A. > A compile: 'foo ^ 5'. > A compile: 'foo ^ 10'. > > (A >> #foo) asHistoricalRingDefinition > > But I have no idea how I can get the two time stamps of A>>foo and the two > source code? > I think we don't have this yet. (Maybe we don't need this, but we need better tool support for Ring). You can see some examples how I played with RGMethods in the version browser scanVersionsOf: method class: aClass meta: meta category: cat selector: aSelector and in ChangeSorterApplication createRingMethodForRemovedSelector: aSelector inClass: aClass > > I cannot figure out what is the difference between > asPassiveRingDefinition, asActiveRingDefinition, asFullRingDefinition… > These methods all return a RGMethodDefinition. > Yes, all are RGMethodDefinitions, the difference is "where the real data is" active ring -> image ( active ring method sourceCode -> code of the actual compiled method) historical ring -> source/changes files ( historical ring method sourceCode -> code fetched from source/changes file (needs a valid sourcePointer)) passive ring -> nowhere, init by instantiation (passive ring method sourceCode -> whatever was provided by the RGMethodDefinition construction) full ring definition controls what other elements are retrieved as ringdefinition, For example every method has a package, but not every RGMethodDefinitions needs to now or has a package: (A>>#foo) asRingDefinition package. -> nil (A>>#foo) asFullRingDefinition package. -> "RGPackage(Unclassified)" > > Cheers, > Alexandre > -- > _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: > Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu > ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;. > > > > >
