> On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 8:25 PM, Esteban Lorenzano <esteba...@gmail.com> > wrote: >> >>> On 14 Sep 2015, at 14:21, David T. Lewis <le...@mail.msen.com> wrote: >>> >>> >>> No, OSProcess should not be included in the image. It is intended to be >>> an external package. >> >> mmm⦠we want to include it as more and more people requires it and we >> can profit from having it in the image (same as FFI). >> why do you think it should be external? > > We should distinguish between having it traditionally-in-Image where > that is the only place it exists and fixes are integrated, and the > current trend (e.g. in-Image Glamorous Tools) where fixes are > integrated "upstream" into an external package >
Yes, that is what I meant. Dave