> On 24 Sep 2015, at 09:59, Marcus Denker <marcus.den...@inria.fr> wrote:
>
>
>> On 22 Sep 2015, at 17:23, roberto.mine...@usi.ch wrote:
>>
>> Hi Marcus,
>>
>> I am finally playing with Reflectivity. In the first place, thanks a lot for
>> this contribution!
>>
>> I am wondering what is the ‘correct’ way to ‘remove’ a MetaLink. Is it
>> enough to call #uninstall on the MetaLink or should I also recompile the
>> class/method where the link is installed?
>>
>> I spotted a problem with the control #after. If you try to pass #arguments
>> to the meta, an error is returned. To reproduce:
>> http://ws.stfx.eu/ONC4K9KQRTNQ
>>
>> Is this behavior somewhat desired, or is a bug?
>>
> Hello, I fixed it:
>
>
> https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/16629/fix-after-on-method-with-arguments
>
>
...
>
> I will integrate this fix and then write more tests (e.g. I think there are
> still problems with an #after on a method that defines temps,
> but it will be easy to fix).
>
As suspected… I added a test + fix in 50343. This update contains the
#availableReifications method, too.
Marcus
