> On 07 Dec 2015, at 11:51 , EuanM <euan...@gmail.com> wrote: > > And indeed, in principle. > > On 7 December 2015 at 10:51, EuanM <euan...@gmail.com> wrote: >> Verifying assumptions is the key reason why you should documents like >> this out for review. >> >> Sven - >> >> I'm confident I understand the use of UTF-8 in principal.
I can only second Sven's sentiment that you need to better differentiate code points (an abstract numerical representation of a character, where a set of such mappings define a charset, such as Unicode), and character encoding forms. (which are how code points are represented in bytes by a defined process such as UTF-8, UTF-16 etc). I know you'll probably think I'm arguing semantics again, but these are *important* semantics ;) Cheers, Henry
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
