This is an excellent news! I have been waiting for that for long!
go go go!

Alexandre
-- 
_,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:
Alexandre Bergel  http://www.bergel.eu
^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.



> On Jan 8, 2016, at 8:07 AM, Tudor Girba <tu...@tudorgirba.com> wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> 
> We are about to integrate in Pharo a new member of the Glamorous Toolkit: the 
> GTDebugger. As this is a significant change that might affect your workflow, 
> here is some background information to help you deal with the change.
> 
> First, you should know that the change is not irreversible and it is easily 
> possible to disabled the new debugger through a setting. However, please do 
> take the time to provide us feedback if something does not work out for you. 
> We want to know what can be improved and we try to react as fast as we can.
> 
> A practical change comes from the fact that the variables are manipulated 
> through a GTInspector, which makes it cheaper to maintain in the longer run.
> 
> While the first thing that will capture the attention is the default generic 
> interface, the real power comes from the moldable nature of the debugger. 
> Like all other GT tools, GTDebugger is also moldable by design. This means 
> that we can construct custom debuggers for specific libraries at small costs 
> (often measured in a couple of hundred lines of code).
> 
> For example, the core configuration includes also the SUnit and the bytecode 
> debugger. These are around 150 lines of code. Here is how the bytecode 
> debugger looks like:
> 
> <bytecode.png>
> 
> You can find more information in an introductory overview blog post that also 
> includes some links for further reading:
> http://www.humane-assessment.com/blog/gtdebugger-in-pharo/ 
> <http://www.humane-assessment.com/blog/gtdebugger-in-pharo/>
> 
> Please let us know what you think.
> 
> Cheers,
> Doru
> 
> 
> --
> www.tudorgirba.com <http://www.tudorgirba.com/>
> www.feenk.com
> 
> "What is more important: To be happy, or to make happy?"
> 

Reply via email to