> On 14 Jan 2016, at 13:31, David Allouche <[email protected]> wrote: > >> >> On 14 Jan 2016, at 01:55, Ben Coman <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 5:45 AM, David Allouche <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> On 13 Jan 2016, at 20:32, stepharo <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>> Hi david >>>> >>>> I would like to turn your post into a chapter for a forthcoming book so >>>> that people can read and get the idea. >>> >>> Yes I would be glad :-) Please just remember to credit the author. >>> >>> Is there a recommended license for Pharo documentation? If not, I am happy >>> to release that text under the MIT License. >>> >>> I would also like to review your derived work. But that is not a >>> requirement. >>> >>>> I did not think about the same object. Is it ok for you? >>>> >>>> Stef >>>> >>>> PS: May be this was obvious for you that we should all get this out of >>>> your previous mail but it was not my case >>>> and not after 8 hours on intense work. >>> >>> Sorry, I do not understand what you are saying here. I do not want to read >>> between the lines, because I would probably misunderstand your intention. >>> >>> Regards. >> >> I hope its okay if I jump in and read between the lines when I see to >> two French people trying to sort out the subtle meanings of english >> over email. >> >> On any given day anyone can be overworked/stressed/worn out, and they >> don't have much time to reason deeply on things. I read "obvious" as >> an acknowledgement that there was further implicit background >> knowledge you likely had to "apply" the info from wikipedia. I notice >> lately Stef's posts have been much shorter than usual, even terse - >> from which I infer he is flat out. I think Stef's english suffers >> when he is in a hurry - only a tiny bit, but email amplifies this. >> >> Don't worry David. When our fiery Stef is upset at you, you won't miss it ;) > > Thank you for the reassurance. > > But that was fine. Stubbing some toes on the rougher personalities in a > community, that is part of the process of figuring out the social context of > any project :-) > > In any case, his initial reaction did prompt me to include a couple of > passive aggressive sentence in my reply. I did remove some :-) but temptation > was too strong and I left some in. And he picked them up. Combative > temperament. > > When you say "upset", you mean like in the thread that announced the > integration of GTDebugger, or was that an example of his baseline? That's an > honest question...
Hm. Oops. That was not supposed to go to the mailing list. :-( I hope that will not upset Stef too much ;-)
