2016-02-20 9:54 GMT+01:00 Marcus Denker <marcus.den...@inria.fr>: > > On 19 Feb 2016, at 22:19, Sven Van Caekenberghe <s...@stfx.eu> wrote: > > > On 19 Feb 2016, at 22:06, Nicolai Hess <nicolaih...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > 2016-02-19 15:37 GMT+01:00 Sven Van Caekenberghe <s...@stfx.eu>: > I am working on https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/16893/Update-STON and I > noticed that class comments did not update, even if they are changed. > > Specifically, the class comments of ConfigurationOfSton and STONWriter did > definitively change, I can see the changed comments in the MC code browser, > but when I load the code, the comments stay the same, both in Nautilus as > using the #comment message. > > #50591 > > !!!!! > There are two changes in the behavior how packages are loaded - somewhere, > don't know what exactly. > See my analysis > 17655 Changes in package loading behavior > I don't know how many changed class comments got lost since Pharo-50497 ! > > > Thanks for looking into this, Nicolai. > > This strikes me as an important bug, not because I reported it, but > because we silently lose code. And because we have to test to guard us > against such loss of functionality. > > > Yes, it seems that for Spur, some code in the class builder was reverted. > (e.g. all the code related to migrating classes with Slots) > > So yes, we have to merge the changes back. > > Marcus > >
Please, someone else who can try to reproduce the first error described in 17655 <https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/17655/Changes-in-package-loading-behavior> Changes in package loading behavior bold vs. normal emphasis for the first package
