On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 6:31 PM, Denis Kudriashov <dionisi...@gmail.com> wrote: > > 2016-03-23 11:02 GMT+01:00 Max Leske <maxle...@gmail.com>: >> >> But from English it not sounds like it should be occurred in past.
Normally thats my cue ;) but I don't have any great ideas. >> So what correct and not long sentence can be used here? maybe: >> >> mock had received someMessage >> >> >> mock should haveReceived someMessage >> > > Thank's for suggestions. Thats idea from Marcus too. But it feels too long. > But maybe. Now I actually already rename #receive to #haveReceived. But I > hope for better sentence. >> >> >> And same question for verification group of message sends (at the end of >> test): >> >> [mock someMessage. mock2 someMessage2] should occur >> >> [mock someMessage. mock2 someMessage2] should occurInSameOrder >> >> >> [ mock someMessage. mock2 somMessage2 ] should have beenSent > > > It's long too. And I wish reduce number of separated words because it is not > good practically. Maybe... [ mock someMessage. mock2 somMessage2 ] shouldve beenSent but maybe you don't want different #shouldXXX messages. cheers -ben > It raises more questions: how it is implemented, what the > better name for intermediate object (result of have in that case) and > others. > At least your suggestion will be like > [ mock someMessage. mock2 somMessage2 ] should haveBeenSent > > Another idea is to use #happen word: > [ mock someMessage. mock2 somMessage2 ] should happen
