Hi Denis,
I was missing this fine-grained logging also so I wrote a couple of
classes, long ago, that use events. It still logs to the Transcript and
to a log file, in parallel. The test doesn't even make a test, to my
chagrin. Look at TraceMonitor for the output bits and at senders of
Object>>#etrace: aTraceEvent for the input side. It's in the class
category: OCapPresentation-Base-Trace & extensions in the Cryptography
repository. I was thinking remote logging, if I can ever untangle this
code. It's always a question of crafty avoidance or sitting down and
digging into code. I can be crafty7.
Cheers,
Robert
On 04/26/2016 04:23 PM, Denis Kudriashov wrote:
Hi
2016-04-26 20:16 GMT+02:00 Sven Van Caekenberghe <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>>:
Try to look at it this way: by using objects (events, signals,
announcements, whatever) and just generating them on the spot and
sending them off somewhere, you have everything you need, without
imposing any restrictions.
If logging system will not allow me to log arbitrary object it would
be restriction. And by "log object" I mean not just adding it to some
log collection. But I need ability to mark objects with tags, messages
and timestamps.
If you want to use log/severity levels and/or categories and/or
tags, you can do that. But I don't want to. Your objects will
contain that info and you will be able to filter on it.
Most of objects not have timestamp, tag or user message. So I can't
filter them in such naked state. And instead of generating special
objects with such information I want logging library take care about it.
Of course for some cases I will need special objects for logs. But I
should not be forced to do it every time.
--
Robert
. .. ... ^,^
