On Thu, May 5, 2016 at 7:12 AM, Bernardo Ezequiel Contreras <vonbecm...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Esteban, > I tried again and it doesn't work. :( > But now i found another issue, if you take a look to pharo5.0/shared > folder you will see the file PharoV40.sources (wrong version for this > release)
This is the correct sources for Pharo5-*beta*. It doesn't become PharoV50.sources until the changes file is compacted for actual *release*. However I understand the confusion. I think this naming is based off the Squeak workflow, where IIUC they just work in, for example 4.5, and don't call it 4.6 until just weeks before release. But we've called it Pharo 5 (beta) for 12 months. I have thought a few times myself that maybe for Pharo 6 we could have PharoV60dev.sources and later PharoV60.sources. cheers -ben > > thanks > > On Sun, May 1, 2016 at 7:13 AM, Esteban Lorenzano <esteba...@gmail.com> > wrote: >> >> >> > On 01 May 2016, at 10:59, Stephan Eggermont <step...@stack.nl> wrote: >> > >> > On 30/04/16 23:13, Bernardo Ezequiel Contreras wrote: >> >> Hi Esteban, >> >> i found a problem with one of the packages, see below >> >> >> >> ** TODO This interpreter (vers. 6505) cannot read image file (vers. >> >> 6521) >> > >> > So you have a non-spur vm there. You need a spur one >> >> yes, but Pharo5.0-linux-oldLibC.zip should download a spur vm… I need to >> review that :) >> >> Esteban >> >> > >> > Stephan >> > >> > >> >> > > > > -- > Bernardo E.C. > > Sent from a cheap desktop computer in South America.
