Le 04/09/2016 à 20:52, Tudor Girba a écrit : > Hi, > > That naming convention is due to the fact that there was a time when > Monticello committed the content of packages based on prefix matching. > > So, if you had: > FileSystem-Core > FileSystem-Core-Tests > committing FileSyste-Core would also commit FileSystem-Core-Tests as a > subcategory. > > Actually, we still have the bug that if you would change something in > FileSystem-Core, FileSystem-Core-Tests would be marked as dirty. >
Exactly! At Synectique we had to rename a lot of packages because this bug was really annoying to know what to commit. We opened an issue: https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/18712/Monticello-have-strange-behavior-if-a-package-begin-by-the-name-of-another-package > Still, it would be much better to have naming of a package reflect a > categorization. So, FileSystem-Core-Tests would be much more preferable. > > Cheers, > Doru > > > -- > www.tudorgirba.com > www.feenk.com > > "If you can't say why something is relevant, > it probably isn't." > > -- Cyril Ferlicot http://www.synectique.eu 2 rue Jacques Prévert 01, 59650 Villeneuve d'ascq France
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
