Why are we not using 3DICC Terf for these? Would work wonderfully.
We can have a persistent area, sound and webcam support, slides, .... Ron, how would it work cost wise for the Pharo Consortium to handle meetings in your servers? Phil Le 9 sept. 2016 09:25, "Norbert Hartl" <norb...@hartl.name> a écrit : > Well, on the one hand this would be super cool. On the other hand nobody > will listen to the meeting because everyone's playing with terf :) > > Norbert > > Am 09.09.2016 um 08:51 schrieb Ron Teitelbaum <r...@usmedrec.com>: > > > > Terf? www.3dicc.com > > > > Ron Teitelbaum > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Pharo-dev [mailto:pharo-dev-boun...@lists.pharo.org] On Behalf Of > Esteban Lorenzano > > Sent: Friday, September 9, 2016 2:47 AM > > To: Pharo Development List > > Subject: [Pharo-dev] [OFF-TOPIC] looking for your wisdom... video > conference service? > > > > Hi, > > > > In the board we decided that we need to have a better support for public > meetings (particularly for consortium meetings but also for others). > > So we wanted to explore other services that would allow is more than 10 > persons participating (this limit is annoying). > > Now, I know google hangouts was able to provide more than 10 connections > (paying), but now I do not find it… maybe I was mistaken? > > Do you have any other service we can try? > > > > Thanks, > > Esteban > > > > > > >
