Wow, this LMDB thing seems pretty cool. Actually, it sounds as if there are no downsides.
What are the limitations ? > On 5 Nov 2016, at 12:12, Jan van de Sandt <jvdsa...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi, > > With the latest 64bits VM (201611042126) and image (60282) UFFI is also > looking good. I'm testing a small library of mine [1] to interface with LMDB > [1], a memory mapped key-value database. Almost all tests are green. This is > great progress! > > I only ran into one issue, a PrimitiveFailed error with #basicIdentityHash in > the SmallFloat64 class. > > Cheers, > Jan. > > [1] http://smalltalkhub.com/#!/~JanVanDeSandt/LightningMDB > [2] https://symas.com/products/lightning-memory-mapped-database/ > > > On Fri, Oct 28, 2016 at 11:56 AM, Esteban Lorenzano <esteba...@gmail.com> > wrote: > VM here: http://bintray.com/estebanlm/pharo-vm/build#files/ > Image here: http://files.pharo.org/get-files/60/pharo-64.zip > > this is still not official (that’s why is not in official place) so there are > a couple of known problems: > > - version format is different, and that breaks some things in image that > depends on it to know what happens > - command line is different and probably you’ll need to play a bit with > options (one or two dashes). > - UFFI has some failing tests (but most of it works). > > I would appreciate some help to report and/or fix the emerging problems. > > cheers, > Esteban > >> On 28 Oct 2016, at 10:39, Thierry Goubier <thierry.goub...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Hi all, >> >> anybody knows how to get (and test) the 64bits version of the Pharo vm and >> image? >> >> Thanks, >> >> Thierry > >
