> On 14 Nov 2016, at 17:18, Cyril Ferlicot D. <cyril.ferli...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On 14/11/2016 15:50, Denis Kudriashov wrote: >> >> 2016-11-14 15:37 GMT+01:00 Esteban A. Maringolo <emaring...@gmail.com >> <mailto:emaring...@gmail.com>>: >> >> Breaking Metacello in any version = Not good. >> >> Metacello is very backward compatible but breaking pragma semantics >> would require a rewrite of many configurations that work okay today >> >> >> Why? ConfigurationOf~ not collect any pragmas by themselves. They only >> declare versions by pragmas. >> And we only need to fix Pharo version of Metacello which is already fork. > > Changes to Metacello should be done on metacello-work repository and not > only on Pharo. Else we will not be able to load the latest Metacello > anymore and we will not have the latest cool features of Dale. >
Yes. The change has to be reverted and then later we need to see what to do in a way that is less disruptive. After we decided to freeze is for sure the wrong time for a change like this. Marcus