> On 14 Nov 2016, at 17:18, Cyril Ferlicot D. <cyril.ferli...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On 14/11/2016 15:50, Denis Kudriashov wrote:
>>
>> 2016-11-14 15:37 GMT+01:00 Esteban A. Maringolo <emaring...@gmail.com
>> <mailto:emaring...@gmail.com>>:
>>
>> Breaking Metacello in any version = Not good.
>>
>> Metacello is very backward compatible but breaking pragma semantics
>> would require a rewrite of many configurations that work okay today
>>
>>
>> Why? ConfigurationOf~ not collect any pragmas by themselves. They only
>> declare versions by pragmas.
>> And we only need to fix Pharo version of Metacello which is already fork.
>
> Changes to Metacello should be done on metacello-work repository and not
> only on Pharo. Else we will not be able to load the latest Metacello
> anymore and we will not have the latest cool features of Dale.
>
Yes. The change has to be reverted and then later we need to see what to do in a
way that is less disruptive.
After we decided to freeze is for sure the wrong time for a change like this.
Marcus
