2016-12-06 11:34 GMT+01:00 Denis Kudriashov <dionisi...@gmail.com>: > > 2016-12-06 11:28 GMT+01:00 Yuriy Tymchuk <yuriy.tymc...@me.com>: > >> Additionally it was annoying if a superclass has a method with the same >> name. For example if you have a name var and you create accessors I’d like >> to have actually a ’name’ getter and not ’name1’ > > > Yes > > If you start to make it so intelligent it requires half a dozen click to generate a simple accessor, then people will stop using the refactoring and write the code by hand...
Thierry
