Hi Guillermo,

Ronie has worked on porting a part of Torch to work with Git PullRequest.
Ronie, can you let Guillermo know how he can try your tool?

Alexandre
-- 
_,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:
Alexandre Bergel  http://www.bergel.eu
^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.



> On Jul 11, 2017, at 3:30 AM, Guillermo Polito <guillermopol...@gmail.com> 
> wrote:
> 
> Hi all,
> 
> As PRs are starting to stack, I think it would be good to gradually merge 
> them. For that, I think it would be good to have both the automatic and a 
> human review.
> 
> When you issue a PR to the development branch, you see two validations are 
> launched:
>  - basic validation
>  - full validation
> 
> So far, they are in red because there are some failing tests (that we should 
> fix BTW).
> 
> By now we can consider that a PR that runs and has some failing tests is OK. 
> Actually, being able to run the tests means also the bootstrap had no 
> problems. I'm tagging such PRs with human-review-needed in github:
> 
> https://github.com/pharo-project/pharo/pulls?q=is%3Apr+is%3Aopen+label%3Ahuman-review-needed
>  
> <https://github.com/pharo-project/pharo/pulls?q=is%3Apr+is%3Aopen+label%3Ahuman-review-needed>
> 
> If gradually people can give their +1 or -1 to the PRs marked like that, we 
> can quickly start integrating fixes.
> 
> Guille
> 
> -- 
>    
> Guille Polito
> 
> Research Engineer
> French National Center for Scientific Research - http://www.cnrs.fr 
> <http://www.cnrs.fr/>
> 
> 
> Web: http://guillep.github.io <http://guillep.github.io/>
> Phone: +33 06 52 70 66 13

Reply via email to