2017-07-23 22:38 GMT+02:00 Nicolas Cellier <
nicolas.cellier.aka.n...@gmail.com>:

>
>
> 2017-07-23 19:56 GMT+02:00 Nicolai Hess <nicolaih...@gmail.com>:
>
>>
>>
>> 2017-07-23 19:42 GMT+02:00 Hernán Morales Durand <
>> hernan.mora...@gmail.com>:
>>
>>> 2017-07-22 10:03 GMT-03:00 Nicolai Hess <nicolaih...@gmail.com>:
>>> >
>>> > Hm, I tried to create the build environment used for the
>>> > windows vm build from opensmalltalk.
>>> >
>>> > I setup a cygwin environment with the same install commands as from
>>> > https://github.com/OpenSmalltalk/opensmalltalk-vm/blob/Cog/.
>>> appveyor.yml
>>> >
>>> > My problems, first it is missing make and wget, I can add make and
>>> wget to the install command line for cygwin, but I am
>>> > curious why it is working on the build server ?
>>> >
>>> > Anyway, after I got this working, the build stops and building the
>>> pkg-config package.
>>> > The log says it can not find a gcc, I know that the build process with
>>> cygwin uses
>>> > i686-w64-mingw32-gcc
>>> > or
>>> > x86_64-w64-mingw32-gcc
>>> >
>>> > But I don't understand where is the missing step to tell the configure
>>> scripts to use the
>>> >
>>> > i686-w64-mingw32-gcc command instead of "gcc",
>>> >
>>> > again, this seems to work on the appveyor build but not locally on my
>>> machine.
>>> >
>>> > Any idea what I had missed?
>>> >
>>>
>>> I solved it in MinGW by adding the path of i686-w64-mingw32-gcc.exe in
>>> your profile. So if you profile is c:\MinGW\msys\1.0\etc\profile and
>>> the .exe is in /c/MinGW/msys/1.0/bin then change as administrator the
>>> line:
>>>
>>> MSYS2_PATH="/usr/local/bin:/usr/bin:/bin"
>>>
>>> to
>>>
>>> MSYS2_PATH="/c/MinGW/msys/1.0/bin:/c/MinGW/bin:/usr/local/bi
>>> n:/usr/bin:/bin"
>>>
>>> And finally
>>>
>>> source /etc/profile
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>>
>>
>> I always had problems using mingw in the past. I got a working mingw
>> environment some years ago, and a newer mingw version
>> did not work well (some changes on the debug and exception format).
>> But now, the build process for pharo did change. (The build instructions
>> on github/pharo-vm are old and do not work anymore.
>>
>> And I hoped to get a more automatic and more reliable build process by
>> using the same commands used by the build server for
>> the opensmalltalk pharo vm sources.
>>
>> And I thought the compiler used to build the latest pharo-vm for windows
>> is from cygwin ?
>>
>>
>>
> Hi Nicolai,
> more exactly we cross compile from a cygwin environment for a mingw target.
> The main reason for switching to cygwin are:
> - this is required for the 64 bit vm
> - the other flavours on opensmallalk (squeak/newspeak) were also built
> with cygwin, so it's more simple to maintain a single way of doing things
>
> Cygwin is required for the 64bits vm because of directx.
> Indeed cygwin still provides support for the legacy directx version used
> by the VM, while recent mingw does not.
> Until we port to a newer API, mingw thus depends on the MS directx include
> and library files that we redistribute for 32 bits only (and we should not
> without permission, I plan to remove these files). That does not work at
> all for 64 bits.
>
> The 64bits VM does not work either with gcc and requires clang currently.
> installing clang in mingw is tedious, while it's a prebuilt package in
> cygwin.
>
> You now know why we use cygwin, not how, maybe it does not terribly helps,
> but it's important in order to avoid regression, or to be aware of what
> need to be done before changing the building environment again...
> Could you detail what you tried exactly?
>


Setup cygwin:

CYG_MIRROR=http://cygwin.mirror.constant.com
CYG_ROOT='c:\cygwin'
CYG_SETUP=setup-x86.exe
MINGW_ARCH=i686
$CYG_SETUP -dgnqNO -R $CYG_ROOT -s "$CYG_MIRROR" -l
"$CYG_ROOT"/var/cache/setup -P
mingw64-$MINGW_ARCH-gcc-core,mingw64-$MINGW_ARCH-gcc-g++,mingw64-$MINGW_ARCH-headers,mingw64-$MINGW_ARCH-runtime,zip,mingw64-$MINGW_ARCH-clang,libiconv-devel,libglib2.0-devel,perl,mingw64-$MINGW_ARCH-zlib,cmake,mingw64-$MINGW_ARCH-win-iconv,make,wget

(taken from the appveyor.xml, I needed to add make and wget, don't know
why, from the appveyor log I see that make and wget is installed, even
without this option...)

Run the build (from an "empty" environment, that is, no other msys or mingw
in the path environment variable)

set FLAVOR=pharo.cog.spur
set ARCH=win32x86
set MINGW_ARCH=i686
set CYG_ROOT=c:\cygwin
set TRAVIS_OS_NAME=windows
set PATH=%CYG_ROOT%\bin;p:\git\bin;%PATH%;
git config --system  core.autocrlf input
git clone -q --depth=5 --branch=Cog
https://github.com/OpenSmalltalk/opensmalltalk-vm.git C:\projects\vm
SET APPVEYOR_BUILD_FOLDER=c:\projects\vm
git checkout -qf 88c4c56245f3308e711b38467bb7636864886d16
%CYG_ROOT%\bin\bash -lc "cd $APPVEYOR_BUILD_FOLDER;exec 0</dev/null;exec
./.travis_build.sh"




>
> Nicolas
>
>
>>> Hernán
>>>
>>> >
>>> > nicolai
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > 2017-03-15 10:11 GMT+01:00 Nicolai Hess <nicolaih...@gmail.com>:
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >> 2017-03-15 9:22 GMT+01:00 philippe.b...@highoctane.be <
>>> philippe.b...@gmail.com>:
>>> >>>
>>> >>> I made my own build here.
>>> >>> Not up to date with latest stuff but should work for the build
>>> process.
>>> >>>
>>> >>> https://ci.appveyor.com/project/philippeback/pharo-vm
>>> >>>
>>> >>> It uses my forked repo and provided you set your own bintray env
>>> vars for API keys will publish there.
>>> >>>
>>> >>> Check all of the output of env vars and where/which in the appveyor
>>> console to see what gets used when when it comes to compilers and so on as
>>> there were various compiler versions involved at one point.
>>> >>>
>>> >>> Third party cache part is also worth checking.
>>> >>>
>>> >>> Still not able to build on my local box at the moment due to some
>>> tools discrepancies happening.
>>> >>>
>>> >>> My build artifacts are embarking too much at this point but allow
>>> you ro get the release, debug, and assert vms for windows. This helps when
>>> debugging as backtraces and so on are much more meaningful and one can use
>>> gdb more effectively to understand what is going on.
>>> >>>
>>> >>> Just keep the dlls and exes and you'll be fine.
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >> Ah good, thank you.
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >>>
>>> >>>
>>> >>> HTH
>>> >>>
>>> >>> Phil
>>> >>>
>>> >>> Le 15 mars 2017 08:58, "Nicolai Hess" <nicolaih...@gmail.com> a
>>> écrit :
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>> 2017-03-14 22:22 GMT+01:00 Nicolas Cellier <
>>> nicolas.cellier.aka.n...@gmail.com>:
>>> >>>>>
>>> >>>>>
>>> >>>>>
>>> >>>>> 2017-03-14 9:30 GMT+01:00 Nicolas Cellier <
>>> nicolas.cellier.aka.n...@gmail.com>:
>>> >>>>>>
>>> >>>>>>
>>> >>>>>>
>>> >>>>>> 2017-03-14 8:58 GMT+01:00 Nicolai Hess <nicolaih...@gmail.com>:
>>> >>>>>>>
>>> >>>>>>>
>>> >>>>>>>
>>> >>>>>>> 2017-03-11 10:01 GMT+01:00 Nicolas Cellier <
>>> nicolas.cellier.aka.n...@gmail.com>:
>>> >>>>>>>>
>>> >>>>>>>> Hi Nicolai,
>>> >>>>>>>>
>>> >>>>>>>> If you look at appveyor.yml configuration on
>>> https://github.com/OpenSmalltalk/opensmalltalk-vm/blob/Cog/.appveyor.yml,
>>> you will see that the pharo brand is not yet in the matrix.
>>> >>>>>>>>
>>> >>>>>>>> It's because builds are based on cygwin, but as I understood,
>>> some library used by some plugin required by pharo refuse to compile with
>>> cygwin. They appear to work with mingw32.
>>> >>>>>>>> Cygwin provides headers for legacy directx, some distribution
>>> of mingw32 did in the past, but it does not seem the case anymore.
>>> >>>>>>>> Using the directx headers from Microsoft SDK is a problem. They
>>> are not redistributable and can't be found anymore on the net (too old). We
>>> cannot seriously base the builds on something so fragile (both technically
>>> and legally) in the long term.
>>> >>>>>>>>
>>> >>>>>>>> Also, the 64 bits VM does only work with clang, and we don't
>>> have anything available as a 64bits Microsoft SDK... So pharo has to fix
>>> that too.
>>> >>>>>>>>
>>> >>>>>>>> In the interim, you should look at
>>> https://github.com/pharo-project/pharo-vm/blob/master/.appveyor.yml and
>>> follow the scripts there.
>>> >>>>>>>
>>> >>>>>>>
>>> >>>>>>> Ok, thank you.
>>> >>>>>>>
>>> >>>>>>
>>> >>>>>>
>>> >>>>>> I gave it a shot on sunday, because it was particularly rainy in
>>> Nantes, and I almost succeeded in compiling all the dependencies with
>>> cygwin.
>>> >>>>>> Well, I mean with autotools cmake libtool pkg-config and I surely
>>> forget a few other niceties that some not so well informed programmers
>>> committed with the faith that it would make their life "easier". It
>>> certainly does not make mine simpler...
>>> >>>>>> Almost, because gcc 5.4.0 failed to compile cairo with ssize_t:
>>> it seems that the workaround of Igor does not work anymore.
>>> >>>>>> ssize_t, WTF???
>>> >>>>>> Maybe I'll be able to fix it tonight. Or tomorrow. In which case
>>> I'll publish the branch to see how far appveyor goes.
>>> >>>>>>
>>> >>>>>>
>>> >>>>>
>>> >>>>>
>>> >>>>> So I solved the ssize_t problem by removing the hack from Igor
>>> which is not necessary anymore...
>>> >>>>> But got another problem soon after while building the tests...
>>> >>>>> There are trailing lines generated at end of
>>> tests/cairo-test-constructors.c that make the compilation fail:
>>> >>>>>
>>> >>>>> i686-w64-mingw32-gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I..  -I. -I./pdiff
>>> -I../boilerplate -I../util/cairo-missing -I../util/cairo-script -I../src
>>> -I../src -D_REENTRANT     -I/cygdrive/y/Smalltalk/opens
>>> malltalk-vm/.thirdparty-cache/windows/i386/include/pixman-1
>>>  
>>> -I/cygdrive/y/Smalltalk/opensmalltalk-vm/.thirdparty-cache/windows/i386/include/libpng16
>>>    -Wall -Wextra -Wmissing-declarations 
>>> -Werror-implicit-function-declaration
>>> -Wpointer-arith -Wwrite-strings -Wsign-compare -Wpacked -Wswitch-enum
>>> -Wmissing-format-attribute -Wvolatile-register-var -Wstrict-aliasing=2
>>> -Winit-self -Wunsafe-loop-optimizations -Wno-missing-field-initializers
>>> -Wno-unused-parameter -Wno-attributes -Wno-long-long -Winline
>>> -fno-strict-aliasing -fno-common -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2
>>> -Wno-unused-but-set-variable                  -D_REENTRANT  -m32
>>> -static-libgcc -static-libstdc++ -I/cygdrive/y/Smalltalk/opensm
>>> alltalk-vm/.thirdparty-cache/windows/i386/include -march=pentium4 -c -o
>>> cairo_test_suite-cairo-test-constructors.o `test -f
>>> 'cairo-test-constructors.c' || echo './'`cairo-test-constructors.c
>>> >>>>> cairo-test-constructors.c:1118:1: attention : la définition de
>>> données n'a pas de type ni de classe de stockage
>>> >>>>>  oning ();
>>> >>>>>  ^
>>> >>>>> cairo-test-constructors.c:1118:1: attention : type defaults to
>>> ‘int’ in declaration of ‘oning’ [-Wimplicit-int]
>>> >>>>> cairo-test-constructors.c:1119:5: attention : la définition de
>>> données n'a pas de type ni de classe de stockage
>>> >>>>>      _register_ft_show_glyphs_table ();
>>> >>>>>      ^
>>> >>>>>
>>> >>>>> And the file looks like it has obviously been overwritten, but not
>>> truncated !!!
>>> >>>>>
>>> >>>>> ...
>>> >>>>> extern void _register_multi_page (void);
>>> >>>>> extern void _register_fallback_resolution (void);
>>> >>>>>
>>> >>>>> void
>>> >>>>> _cairo_test_runner_register_tests (void)
>>> >>>>> {
>>> >>>>>     _register_a1_bug ();
>>> >>>>>     _register_a1_clip_paint ();
>>> >>>>> ...
>>> >>>>>     _register_multi_page ();
>>> >>>>>     _register_fallback_resolution ();
>>> >>>>> }
>>> >>>>> oning ();
>>> >>>>>     _register_ft_show_glyphs_table ();
>>> >>>>>     _register_ft_text_vertical_layout_type1 ();
>>> >>>>>     _register_ft_text_vertical_layout_type3 ();
>>> >>>>>     _register_ft_text_antialias_none ();
>>> >>>>>     _register_ps_eps ();
>>> >>>>>     _register_ps_features ();
>>> >>>>>     _register_ps_surface_source ();
>>> >>>>>     _register_svg_surface ();
>>> >>>>>     _register_svg_clip ();
>>> >>>>>     _register_svg_surface_source ();
>>> >>>>>     _register_multi_page ();
>>> >>>>>     _register_fallback_resolution ();
>>> >>>>> }
>>> >>>>>
>>> >>>>> This file is generated by a shell script
>>> test/make-cairo-test-constructors.sh
>>> >>>>> I can't find any reference of the bug, and upgrade to version
>>> 1.14.8 does not solve the issue.
>>> >>>>> So it will wait until tomorrow...
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>> I got the build for windows with mingw nearly working. (it can not
>>> build some plugins, like SqueakSSL for windows, because the used wincrypt.h
>>> is different in the mingw distrubtion).
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>> I still have the problem, that there seems to be a preprocessing
>>> step , that should put the vm-version (and source timestamp) in the
>>> sqSCCSVersion.h
>>> >>>> I got this working  by running .travis_build.sh (with the options
>>> for arch/flavor/platform) But how is this done normally when you build a vm
>>> locally?
>>> >>>> And how is this done for the pharo-vm we currently use?
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>>>
>>> >>>>>
>>> >>>>> Nicolas
>>> >>>>>
>>> >>>>>>>>
>>> >>>>>>>> I hope that Esteban will find time to resolve all these
>>> problems and have pharo brand back on opensmalltalk-vm. I guess that any
>>> form of help is welcome.
>>> >>>>>>>>
>>> >>>>>>>> Nicolas
>>> >>>>>>>>
>>> >>>>>>>>
>>> >>>>>>>> 2017-03-11 8:33 GMT+01:00 Nicolai Hess <nicolaih...@gmail.com>:
>>> >>>>>>>>>
>>> >>>>>>>>> I still have problems building a vm on windows.
>>> >>>>>>>>> can you give me some hints how to start ?
>>> >>>>>>>>> I cloned the recent pharo-vm project,
>>> >>>>>>>>> in opensmalltalk-vm\build.win32x86\pharo.cog.spur\
>>> >>>>>>>>> run
>>> >>>>>>>>> mvm
>>> >>>>>>>>>
>>> >>>>>>>>> But I got a couple of problems (mingw-32 compiler commands not
>>> found, I had to adjust the include path for finding directx header, missing
>>> variable replacement for git-versions).
>>> >>>>>>>>> So I may miss some important steps.
>>> >>>>>>>>> Is there a repository where I can clone the mingw environment
>>> used to build the win32-pharo-vm, the environment used on the build-server ?
>>> >>>>>>>>>
>>> >>>>>>>>> Thanks
>>> >>>>>>>>> Nicolai
>>> >>>>>>>>>
>>> >>>>>>>>> 2017-02-04 1:50 GMT+01:00 Nicolai Hess <nicolaih...@gmail.com
>>> >:
>>> >>>>>>>>>>
>>> >>>>>>>>>>
>>> >>>>>>>>>>
>>> >>>>>>>>>> 2017-02-04 1:44 GMT+01:00 Nicolai Hess <nicolaih...@gmail.com
>>> >:
>>> >>>>>>>>>>>
>>> >>>>>>>>>>>
>>> >>>>>>>>>>>
>>> >>>>>>>>>>> 2017-01-23 8:59 GMT+01:00 Esteban Lorenzano <
>>> esteba...@gmail.com>:
>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>
>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>
>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> On 22 Jan 2017, at 13:19, Nicolai Hess <
>>> nicolaih...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>
>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>
>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>
>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> 2017-01-22 10:21 GMT+01:00 Clément Bera <
>>> bera.clem...@gmail.com>:
>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> I believe they're built from
>>> https://github.com/OpenSmalltalk/vm using travis and appveyor. On the
>>> gitbhub readme there are relevant links. All built artifacts are also kept
>>> on bintray for history.
>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>
>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Thank you!
>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>
>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>
>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> no, they aren’t :)
>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> instead, they are built here:
>>> https://github.com/pharo-project/pharo-vm
>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>
>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> (README still not updated)
>>> >>>>>>>>>>>
>>> >>>>>>>>>>>
>>> >>>>>>>>>>> what did changed ? I am not able to build the vm on windows
>>> anymore (something wrong with generating the generator.image, I'll now
>>> reset my local pharo-vm build directory and see if it works afterwards).
>>> >>>>>>>>>>
>>> >>>>>>>>>>
>>> >>>>>>>>>> see attached the stderr log :
>>> >>>>>>>>>>
>>> >>>>>>>>>> 'Errors in script loaded from u:\github\pharo-vm\scripts\Loa
>>> dVMMaker.st'
>>> >>>>>>>>>> [31mMessageNotUnderstood: receiver of "default:" is nil
>>> >>>>>>>>>> [0mUndefinedObject(Object)>>doesNotUnderstand: #default:
>>> >>>>>>>>>> BaseSoundSystem class>>initialize
>>> >>>>>>>>>> MCMethodDefinition>>postloadOver:
>>> >>>>>>>>>>
>>> >>>>>>>>>> ....
>>> >>>>>>>>>>
>>> >>>>>>>>>>>
>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Are we still working with branch spur-64, or are we back on
>>> master ?
>>> >>>>>>>>>>>
>>> >>>>>>>>>>>
>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>
>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>
>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Esteban
>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>
>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>
>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sun, Jan 22, 2017 at 9:25 AM, Nicolai Hess <
>>> nicolaih...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Where are the latest Pharo-spur-vms (32bit) are built?
>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> I don't see them on the build server, only the
>>> buildresults at
>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://files.pharo.org/vm/pharo-spur32/linux/
>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> The latest builds on the buildserver are from the last
>>> year only.
>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> nicolai
>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>
>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>
>>> >>>>>>>>>>>
>>> >>>>>>>>>>
>>> >>>>>>>>>
>>> >>>>>>>>
>>> >>>>>>>
>>> >>>>>>
>>> >>>>>
>>> >>>>
>>> >>
>>> >
>>>
>>>
>>
>

Reply via email to