On Tue, Aug 22, 2017 at 5:51 PM, Guillermo Polito
<guillermopol...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Marcus,
>
> Please, do not relaunch the build if there is a test failure. That
> simply does not fix the problem, it just adds noise. There are two
> problems:
>
> 1) we have some sporadic test failures (sometimes network, sometimes
> some mutex or delay issues). They do not happen all the time and
> that's why sometimes there is one or two failing tests. We should
> detect these tests and fix them to be more robust
>
>    >> Note, is there some brave soul that would like to take action here?

I started to make a log of these tests.

> 2) sometimes the vm crashes while running the tests. We should detect
> the bug and fix it.
>
>    >> Note, is there some brave soul that would like to take action here?
>
> Now, if we are integrating a fix, this means that the PR was **already
> validated as green**. That means that the integrated commit can be
> bootstrapped and tested (and all tests are green).
>
> Moreover, running the tests after integration (and its build color)
> does not change the integration in itself: the commit was already
> merged and pushed into the main branch, so even if it fails always,
> it's too late. So, relaunching the build does not really change
> anything (besides the impression we may have about the build).
>
> A complementary solution (that should go together with fixing the
> tests) is to add a retry policy while running tests in the CI.
>
>    >> Note, is there some brave soul that would like to take action here?
>
> Guille, on holidays from the phone.

Enjoy your vacation :)



>
> On 8/22/17, Marcus Denker <marcus.den...@inria.fr> wrote:
>> [ Pharo 70 ] Build 52 PR 205
>> index-inst-var-should-move-from-Slot-to-IndexedSlot
>>       https://github.com/pharo-project/pharo/pull/205
>>       https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/20191
>>
>>  Build 53: failed, redone as 54
>>
>> [ Pharo 70 ] Build 54 PR 193 Integrate WebBrowser-Core package to be able to
>> open a browser on a URL
>>       https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/20304
>>       https://github.com/pharo-project/pharo/pull/193
>>
>>  Build 55: failed, redone as 56 (I do not like to use this build number…
>> with builds failing, we will always get the
>> question “and what was in build XX?).
>>
>> [ Pharo 70 ] Build 56 PR 174
>> 20260-FastTable-not-support-cell-morphs-with-stepping-animation #174
>>       https://github.com/pharo-project/pharo/pull/174
>> https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/20260/
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> --
>
>
>
>
> Guille Polito
>
>
> Research Engineer
>
> French National Center for Scientific Research - *http://www.cnrs.fr*
> <http://www.cnrs.fr>
>
>
>
> *Web:* *http://guillep.github.io* <http://guillep.github.io>
>
> *Phone: *+33 06 52 70 66 13
>

Reply via email to