> On 2 Oct 2017, at 17:33, Denis Kudriashov <[email protected]> wrote: > > > 2017-10-02 17:26 GMT+02:00 Sean P. DeNigris <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>>: > Peter Uhnák wrote > > http://forum.world.st/IMPORTANT-iceberg-home-changed-tp4944480p4944684.html > > <http://forum.world.st/IMPORTANT-iceberg-home-changed-tp4944480p4944684.html> > > I still don't understand :/ > > Me too :) > I think it was not actually discussed and explained. At least linked thread > not describes it.
not everything can be discussed, but it was explained (in that link, it is explained very well): - it is easier to organise related work into teams (for example: iceberg, libgit2 bindings, filetree and now tonel) than to have everything on same team. - is also a marketing stuff: more groups of pharo related stuff in github. - it is also an easy choice: if that does not works, is very easy to change and group everything (but today I still think it was a good decision) Esteban > > What benefit justifies the complexity of > multiple organizations? Isn't the concept of GH orgs inherently and > specifically to host multiple projects?! > > > > ----- > Cheers, > Sean > -- > Sent from: http://forum.world.st/Pharo-Smalltalk-Developers-f1294837.html > <http://forum.world.st/Pharo-Smalltalk-Developers-f1294837.html> > >
